|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 3:31:28 GMT -8
:/
I've been waiting a month for an imperial. And they're supposed to be born on the 8th... now I'll have to wait three days..
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 3:34:41 GMT -8
Awww... That sucks! DX
If it's any consolation, I'm still waiting on an Imperial reservation I made in mid-June. I only have to wait another month or two if I'm lucky. ;u;
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 3:35:51 GMT -8
oh wow! that's pretty crazy! XD I'm so lucky. I paid 140k for mine! It was back when all the games were down so money was hard to make!
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 3:41:29 GMT -8
I made my reservation wayyy back when Imperials were averaging around 200Kish. Of course, there was a lot less treasure in circulation so it evened out. I paid 500 gems for an ungened basic Imp. :3 (Although, even then, that particular user had their reservations set pretty low which I was quite grateful for.)
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 3:45:05 GMT -8
oh that's really cool. Yeah these are double gened imperials. I still cant believe I paid 140k for one!
:/ hopefully they wont have a 1 egg nest that hatches out to be a wildclaw. I will probably cry if that ever happened.
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 3:48:27 GMT -8
Woah! For a double-gened? Huh. Now you're making me feel like a spendthrift. I just bought an ungened Imp off the AH for 500K about a week and a half ago. Shot all my Sky Dancer scroll savings then and there, but he was a Grey/Seafoam cutie. Geez. I should pay more attention to reservations if the prices are this much less.
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 3:55:27 GMT -8
did I hear grey/seafoam? This is the parent I'll be getting the baby from:
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 3:58:51 GMT -8
Woah! Nice. This is the boy I spent all my treasure on. Gonna give him Shimmer and I have a nice Shadow/Lavender WC lined up for his first breeding. I'm going to switch her out for a White or Rose/Seafoam later for some pretty pastel Imp babus. X3
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 4:02:13 GMT -8
ooooh! that's so pretty! the pairing I'll be getting my dragonling from could toss out anything really. The last baby was this guy: ;____; I almost got him too. But my slot was bumped down because I was 40k short. I'm just glad my friend spotted me the money for the next batch!
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 4:06:39 GMT -8
Oh gosh! Is that Sky/Rose I see? Ah man, my condolences for the lost opportunity. Hopefully this coming breeding will produce one just as or even more magnificent than that! ^_^
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 4:13:07 GMT -8
Thats what I'm hoping!
I dont care what I get. lol I can always skin 'em. But .... hhhnnngh... that baby... that baaaabby... ;___; I wuvs him.
|
|
|
Post by dracamari on Aug 6, 2013 4:15:29 GMT -8
oh yes, cheap early Imperials, I loooove the one I got for 900 gems <3
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 4:17:41 GMT -8
*shakes fist at air*
Then again, I'm glad the price has gone up? It makes them more worthwhile to breed now.
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 4:17:44 GMT -8
Hu hu hu. Sometimes I'll go to the very beginning (or is that back?) of the sales threads and cry at the prices dragons were going for at the beginning of FR. ;u;
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 4:21:00 GMT -8
now just wait...
gems will go up to 1000 treasure for 1 gem...
and we'll all sit back like old cronies and "remember the good 'ol days".
hu hu hu hu
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 4:24:17 GMT -8
I honestly don't know what to think about gem prices anymore. On one hand, if they're low, cheaper gem items. On the other hand, higher gem prices mean I can spend money on the site without feeling like I've made a big loss. I guess overall, higher is better? For the site that is. Hum.
|
|
|
Post by dracamari on Aug 6, 2013 4:29:27 GMT -8
Maybe it's a good thing that gems-to-treasure ratio goes up. For $20 of gems I would get less than 200kT. For that amount of real money I would expect to be able to get a gene'd Ridgeback.
|
|
|
Post by Zrcalo on Aug 6, 2013 4:30:26 GMT -8
I think it should be at a good medium really. Right now they're waaaay too low. They shouldnt be /unreachable/ though.
I think 500t for 1 gem should probably be a good median.
that's 1mil for an item that's 2k gems.
Reaching 75k limit on games a day should give you that in about 13 days. ..... .......hhrrm. maybe 500t for one gem is too much.
|
|
|
Post by dracamari on Aug 6, 2013 4:33:25 GMT -8
I do like the 500:1 ratio actually. That would make the WC scroll actually rare XD
|
|
|
Post by ersatzlace on Aug 6, 2013 4:34:47 GMT -8
Oh geez. 1 mil for a WC scroll? Uhhh... I thiiink... maybe 100-150t for 1 gem is a better range. In my opinion at least. Of course, what do I know about virtual economies? I'm a simple English major. :>
|
|